Jump To Navigation

Fuel Fed Fire Cases

Every car maker will tell you that no vehicle is “fire-proof.”  However, every engineer will also tell you that if someone is able to physically survive the impact forces of an accident or collision, that person should not burn alive inside his or her vehicle.  Automobile manufacturers owe it to their consumers and passengers to ensure that their vehicles are safe and that design flaws will not lead to post-collision fires. 

Langdon & Emison attorneys have devoted a substantial amount of their time to fighting post-collision fire defect claims.  Our lawyers have developed a library of information concerning these defects and cases.  In fact, Langdon & Emison lawyers teach other attorneys how to litigate and win these lawsuits.

The cases listed below are only a fraction of the post-accident fire cases that our law firm has handled.  For more information about post-accident fire claims, see the articles and presentations below that were written and created by Langdon & Emison attorneys:

When motorists get burned
When Motorists Get Burned
Explosive Cases Involving Defective Fuel Systems
Explosive Cases Involving Defective Fuel Systems
Post Collision Fuel Fed Fires
Post Collision Fuel Fed Fires
Post-Collision Fuel-Fed Fires
Post-Collision Fuel-Fed Fires
GM Side Saddle Fuel Tank
GM Side Saddle Fuel Tank
Safety Forum Logo
Manufacturers have long been aware of the risk of fires associated with defective fuel systems…


CASE NAME
TYPE OF CASE
SYNOPSIS

Wasilik v. Ford

Fuel Siphoning After Compromise of Fuel System

$26.4 million verdict

A post-collision fuel-fed fire resulted when gasoline siphoned out of the fuel tank in a head-on collision causing serious burns to those involved.  Mr. Wasilik was awarded $26,407,402.43 for severe burns caused when gasoline siphoned out of the fuel tank. At the time, this was the largest tort verdict awarded in the state of Maryland.

Click Here to view a news account about this case.

Click Here to view a news article about this case.

Mathes v. Ford

Fuel Tank Puncture / Trucking Accident

$12.5 million verdict

Another vehicle collided into an F-150 causing the fuel tank to be punctured. A large fire resulted and three people were burned to death. This case resulted in a $12.5 verdict for Mr. Mathes, whose son and parents burned to death in this collision, which also involved a semi-truck.

Click Here to view a computer reenactment of the collision in this case that was prepared for trial.

Click Here to view an article concerning this case.

Baker v. GM

Fuel Siphoning After Compromise of Fuel System

$11.3 million verdict

Two adults were burned to death in a post-collision fuel-fed fire that resulted from a defect in the car, namely, that the car did not have an anti-siphoning device. The jury awarded $11.3 million for the family of the two people in this case.

This case was the very first in the country to have admitted into evidence what has been termed the “Ivey Memo” in which a General Motors engineer compared the cost of fixing fire-causing defects with the deaths that resulted from vehicle fires.  GM concluded that it could only spend $2.25 per vehicle to prevent fires – after that, it was in GM’s economic interests to pay wrongful death lawsuits rather than fix the problems.

Click Here to view the United States Supreme Court 9-0 decision in favor of the Baker family.

Click Here for a Missouri Lawyer’s Weekly article discussing this case.

Click Here for the United States Supreme Court’s summary of its opinion in this case.

Click Here for an article examining the United States Supreme Court’s decision in this case.

Alexander v. GM

Torn Fuel Line / Door Locking Mechanism

Confidential Settlement

A torn fuel line caused a fire and the plaintiff sustained serious injuries. This case resulted in a confidential settlement while the jury was deliberating on its verdict.

Clark v. GM

Side Saddle Gas Tank

Confidential Settlement

A pickup, designed with side saddle gas tanks, ran off the road and struck a culvert which compromised the tanks. A post-collision fuel-fed fire resulted, killing the driver. This case resulted in a confidential settlement.

Dobbs v. GM

Fuel Tank Puncture

Confidential Settlement

A post-collision fuel-fed fire in a  General Motors C/L truck resulted in serious burns to a victim because the gasoline tank was punctured when the vehicle slid off the road and hit a tree. This case resulted in a confidential settlement.

Gribat v. GM

Side Saddle Gas Tank

Confidential Settlement

A General Motors C/K truck was involved in a head-on collision resulting in the rupture of the side saddle tank. The accident caused a burn death. This case resulted in a confidential settlement.

Head v. GM

Ruptured Fuel Tank

Confidential Settlement

A General Motors C/K truck struck a tree and ruptured its gas tank, resulting in a post-collision fuel-fed fire. The fire caused severe burns and death. This case resulted in a confidential settlement.

 

Hinderks v. GM

Punctured Fuel Tank

Confidential Settlement

A gasoline tank was punctured when another vehicle struck a General Motors C/K truck causing a post-collision fuel-fed fire that resulted in burn deaths. This case resulted in a confidential settlement.

Hundelson v. GM

Ruptured Gas Tank

Confidential Settlement

A  General Motors C/K truck struck a tree and ruptured its gas tank, resulting in a post-collision fuel-fed fire. The fire caused severe burns and death. This case resulted in a confidential settlement.

Klarlund v. GM

Ruptured Fuel Tank

Confidential Settlement

This case involves a collision fuel-fed fire with a General Motors C/K truck in a T-bone accident. The gasoline tank ruptured and the plaintiff was burned to death. This case resulted in a confidential settlement.

Moore v. Ford
No Photo Available

Fuel Siphoning After Compromise of Fuel System

Confidential Settlement

Mrs. Moore was burned to death in a post-collision fuel-fed fire that resulted from the siphoning of gasoline out of the tank. Additionally, Moore was trapped inside her vehicle because the doors were defective and would not open. 

Pierce v. Honda

Ruptured Fuel Tank

Confidential Settlement

A Honda passenger car collided with a guardrail, riding up on top of it. This collision sliced the tank open and caused a fire. There were numerous burn victims and a death. This case resulted in a confidential settlement.

Shaffer-Kleoppel v. GM

In-Cab Gas Tank Puncture

Confidential Settlement

This case involved a post-collision fuel-fed fire where the gasoline escaped from a gasoline tank inside the passenger compartment of a General Motors pickup truck. The plaintiff suffered severe burns. This case resulted in a confidential settlement.

Turner v. GM

In-Cab Fuel Tank Puncture / Aged Tire

Confidential Settlement

Travis Turner was driving a General Motors pickup when one of its tires experienced a catastrophic detread.  Travis lost control of the truck and collided with another vehicle.  The fuel tank, which was located inside the cab of the truck, was compromised and Travis burned to death.  This case resulted in a confidential settlement.

Click Here to view a news video about this case.

Williams v. Ford

Fuel System Compromise

Confidential Settlement

A Ford Thunderbird was rear-ended by another vehicle. Williams, a police officer in Maui, Hawaii was trapped underneath the burning Thunderbird and burned to death. This case resulted in a confidential settlement before the jury was impaneled.

Langdon & Emison | 911 Main Street | P.O. Box 220 | Lexington, MO 64067 | Phone: 660-259-6175